Analysis of social and psychological factors influencing the treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease under the regular epidemic prevention and control of coronavirus disease 2019.

Objective To explore the sociodemographic and psychological factors influencing the continuity of treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease under the regular epidemic prevention and control of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods A total of 277 patients with chronic kidney disease who were admitted to Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University) from Apr. 2020 to Mar. 2021 were enrolled and divided into 3 groups: non-dialysis group (n=102), hemodialysis (HD) group (n=108), and peritoneal dialysis (PD) group (n=67). All patients were investigated by online and offline questionnaires, including self-designed basic situation questionnaire, self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), and self-rating depression scale (SDS). The general sociodemographic data, anxiety and depression of the 3 groups were compared, and the influence of sociodemographic and psychological factors on the interruption or delay of treatment was analyzed by binary logistic regression model. Results There were significant differences in age distribution, marital status, occupation, medical insurance type, caregiver type, whether there was an urgent need for hospitalization and whether treatment was delayed or interrupted among the 3 groups (all P0.05). The average SAS score of 65 PD patients was 38.15+/-15.83, including 53 (81.5%) patients without anxiety, 7 (10.8%) patients with mild anxiety, and 5 (7.7%) patients with moderate to severe anxiety. The average SAS score of 104 patients in the HD group was 36.86+/-14.03, including 81 (77.9%) patients without anxiety, 18 (17.3%) patients with mild anxiety, and 5 (4.8%) patients with moderate to severe anxiety. There were no significant differences in the mean score of SAS or anxiety severity grading between the 2 groups (both P0.05). The mean SDS scores of 65 PD patients were 53.42+/-13.30, including 22 (33.8%) patients without depression, 21 (32.3%) patients with mild depression, and 22 (33.8%) patients with moderate to severe depression. The mean SDS scores of 104 patients in the HD group were 50.79+/-10.76, including 36 (34.6%) patients without depression, 56 (53.8%) patients with mild depression, and 12 (11.6%) patients with moderate to severe depression. There were no significant differences in mean SDS scores or depression severity grading between the 2 groups (both P0.05). The results of intra-group comparison showed that the incidence and severity of depression were higher than those of anxiety in both groups. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis showed that high school education level (odds ratio OR=5.618, 95% confidence interval CI) 2.136-14.776, P0.01), and unmarried (OR=6.916, 95% CI 1.441-33.185, P=0.016), divorced (OR= 5.588, 95% CI 1.442-21.664, P=0.013), urgent need for hospitalization (OR=8.655, 95% CI 3.847-19.476, P0.01) could positively promote the continuity of treatment in maintenance dialysis patients under the regular epidemic prevention and control of COVID-19. In the non-dialysis group, no sociodemographic and psychological factors were found to be associated with the interruption or delay of treatment (P0.05). Conclusion Education, marital status, and urgent need for hospitalization are correlated with the continuity of treatment in patients with chronic kidney disease on maintenance dialysis.Copyright © 2022, Second Military Medical University Press. All rights reserved.

Hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis in COVID-19 clinical characteristics and outcomes: A single-center experience

The aim of this work was to perform a comparative analysis of the prevalence and clinical and laboratory features of the course of COVID-19 infection in patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease receiving kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Methods. A retrospective analysis of 73 medical records of patients undergoing KRT and infected COVID-19 between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2021. The patients were divided into two groups. The first group consisted of 54 hemodialysis (HD) patients, and the second group included 19 peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Routine clinical and laboratory characteristics, morbidity, and mortality of COVID-19 depending on KRT modality were analysed. Results. The overall prevalence of COVID-19 was 37.63%. Mortality in this cohort of patients was 19.07%, and mortality associated with COVID-19 was 6.19%. Despite the predominance of COVID-19-associated morbidity in HD patients (46.55% vs. 24.36%, p = 0.05), mortality was not statistically significantly different between the studied groups (26.32% in PD patients vs. 12.96% in HD patients, p = 0.17). HD patients had more severe lung injury as measured by SpO2 (p=0.18) and CT (p=0.003), while PD patients had lower hemoglobin (p=0.001), platelet (p=0.001), total protein (p<0.001), and albumin (p<0.001) levels. A direct correlation was found between the percentage of lung injury according to the CT data and the leukocyte count in both the HD (r = 0.24) and PD (r = 0.56) groups. In addition, an inverse correlation between leukocyte and SpO2 values and between the percentage of lung injury according to the CT data and SpO2 indicators was found in the HD (r = -0.51 and r = -0.66) and PD (r = -0.47 and r = -0.63) groups, respectively. Conclusions. The results of our study are in complete agreement with published data and show the same COVID-19-associated mortality in HD and PD patients, with a statistically significantly higher prevalence of COVID-19 in HD patients. The course of COVID-19 in HD patients is characterized by more severe lung injury compared to PD patients, while PD patients had more pronounced anemia and significantly lower platelet, total protein, and blood albumin concentrations. © T. Yarmola, L. Tkachenko, H. Pustovoyt, S. Rustamian, V. Talash, Iu. Kostrikova, L. Miakinkova, O. Gutsalenko, 2023. All rights reserved.

The Impact of Dialysis Sessions on Blood Levels of D-dimer among Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Infected with COVID-19

Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic is a real challenge to our communities worldwide, exerting a high socioeconomic impact. The disease is associated with a great deal of co-agulation cascade disorder, with a considerable increase in D-dimer concentration in blood. Objec-tives: To assess the impact of dialysis session frequency on blood levels of D-dimer among CKD patients infected with COVID-19. Patients and Methods: The study included 40 CKD patients (22 males and 18 females) infected with COVID-19, who attended the Artificial Kidney Unit at Al Hussein Teaching Hospital, Thi-Qar, Iraq for regular dialysis. They were divided into two groups;Group I: 20 CKD patients who had COVID-19. They underwent one hemodialysis session per week. The second group, which included 20 CKD patients infected with COVID-19 underwent three dialysis sessions per week. Plasma levels of D-dimer were measured one day before the start of the study and one day after three weeks in both groups. Result(s): The results of the present study re-vealed that CKD patients infected with COVID-19 who underwent three dialysis session per week (Group II) had a significant drop in blood D-dimer level at the end of three weeks in comparison to the initial values. Furthermore, the decrease in blood D-dimer level was significantly higher among CKD patients with COVID-19 who underwent three dialysis sessions per week (Group II) in comparison to COVID-19 infected CKD patients who underwent single dialysis sessions per week (Group I). Conclusion(s): CKD patients with COVID-19 have an elevated blood level of D-dimer. Increasing the frequency of hemodialysis plays an essential role in lowering the serum D-dimer level among these patients.Copyright © 2023, Colegio de Farmaceuticos de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. All rights reserved.

Risk factors for COVID-19 incidence and mortality in patients on maintenance hemodialysis

Patients on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) are highly susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 and with high mortality rates due to Coronavirus disease 2019, mainly because of the older age in this group of patients, comorbidities, compromised immune status due to uremia, as well as inability to keep social isolation because of the necessity for regular physical presence in dialysis facility. Several retrospective studies of patients on MHD in Europe, America and Asia, show high susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 in this group of patients with very high rates of critical course of the disease and high mortality rates, reaching more than 40% The aim of this retrospective observational study was to identify risk factors among patients on intermittent hemodialysis for infection with SARS-CoV-2 as well as predictors of severe COVID-19 and fatal outcome. Materials and methods. We analyzed 69 patients receiving intermittent dialysis in Aleksandrovska University Hospital - Hemodialysis Unit. 34 of them have been tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 in the period from September 2020 (when the first case of the disease was registered for our dialysis center) up to March 2022, and are compared with a control group of 35 dialysis-dependent patients without COVID-19. Data about comorbidities, main laboratory and radiologic findings, need of hospitalization and treatment in ICU, as well as data for conducted treatment, are collected from electronic medical records. To identify predictors of severe COVID and poor outcome we compared the group of survivors with the one of non-survivors. Results. There are no significant differences between patients on MHD with and without COVID-19 except higher frequency of COPD and hypoproteinemia in the positive group. Older age, female gender, history of smoking, lymphopenia with neutrophilia, treatment in ICU and need of mechanical ventilation, signs of malnutrition - hypoproteinemia and lower levels of serum creatinine, are risk factors for severe disease and fatal outcomes. Conclusions. The course of COVID infection in dialysis-dependent patients is severe and with high mortality rate, in line with other studies worldwide. Malnutrition is the main risk factor for COVID and also main predictor for poor outcomes.

CHARACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS WHO RECEIVED BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT AFTER KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION AND THE INCIDENCE OF SERIOUS INFECTIONS: A MULTICENTER STUDY

BackgroundKidney transplant patients due to both primary kidney involvement of chronic/autoimmune inflammatory diseases and end-stage kidney disease related to amyloidosis are followed up in rheumatology clinics. Biological agents one of the treatment options in kidney transplant recipients with chronic/autoimmune inflammatory disease.ObjectivesHowever, there is insufficient data on the development of infection in kidney transplant recipients who received biological treatment. Herein, we aimed to determine the incidence of serious infections in patients with kidney transplant recipients who are received biological therapy.MethodsKidney transplant recipients who are received biological agents due to rheumatologic disease were included in the study. Patients' demographic features, transplantation data, biological treatment, development of infection and severity of infection were screened retrospectively. Infections that requiring hospitalization were defined as severe infections.ResultsA total of 31 patients were included in the study, 14 (45%) of whom were female and mean age was 41 ±9 years. Twenty-five patients (80%) of them were non-preemptive kidney transplant and mean duration of hemodialysis before the transplantation was 40 ±40 months. Twenty-three patients (74%) had end stage kidney failure due to FMF-amyloidosis(Figure-1-). Seventeen patients (54%) received anakinra, 11 patients (35%) received canakinumab and 3 patients (10%) received etanercept with other immunosuppressive treatment. Mean treatment duration of biological agents was 4.2±2.6 years. Two patients developed solid organ malignancy and one patient developed hematological malignancy after transplantation. Sixteen of the patients (52%) were hospitalized at least once due to infection and 4 patients (13%) died due to infection. The cause of decease in two patients was COVID-19.ConclusionRheumatic diseases are an important cause of end-stage renal disease and definitive treatment is kidney transplantation. Kidney transplant recipients due to rheumatological disease also use biological agents in the post-transplantation period. Kidney transplant recipients have higher risk for the development of infection since they receive immunosuppressive therapy and use of biologic agents may further increase the risk for development infection. Meyer et al reported that infection developed in 54 of 187 solid organ transplant recipients using biological agents.[1] Mean treatment duration of biological agents was 12 months in this study. The incidence of infection was 54% in our study. Mean treatment duration of biological agent was 4.2 year was considered main reason for higher incidence of infection in our study.Reference[1]Meyer F, Weil-Verhoeven D, Prati C, Wendling D, Verhoeven F. Safety of biologic treatments in solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2021 Dec;51(6):1263-1273. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.08.013. Epub 2021 Aug 26. Erratum in: Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2022 Aug;55:152015. PMID: 34507811.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

Long-COVID sequelae are associated with oxidative stress in hemodialysis patients

The pathophysiology of long-COVID sequelae in the general population of SARS-CoV-2-infected patients has been shown to be strongly influenced by oxidative stress. However, the potential role of oxidative stress in the development of long-COVID sequelae in hemodialysis patients (HD) has never been investigated. The present study aimed to evaluate the oxidative status of HD patients 3.5 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection in relation to the presence of long-COVID sequelae and the severity of the acute phase COVID-19. Methods. This cross-sectional cohort study included 63 HD patients with a median age of 55 (43-62.5) years and a dialysis vintage of 42 (25-73) months who had been infected with COVID-19 at least 3 months before recruitment. Patients were divided into two groups according to the occurrence of long-COVID sequelae: Group 1 included 31 (49.2%) HD patients with sequelae, while Group 2 included 32 (50.8%) fully recovered individuals. At 3.5 (3.2-4.6) months after the acute phase of COVID-19, malondialdehyde (MDA) and erythrocyte levels (MDAe), sulfhydryl groups (SH -groups), serum catalase activity, transferrin, and ceruloplasmin were measured. A comparison of the obtained data was performed using the Student's test or the Mann-Whitney test according to the data distribution. A correlation was evaluated with the Spearman test. Results. HD patients with persistent long-COVID sequelae had significantly higher concentrations of MDAs (p = 0.002), MDAe (p = 0.0006), and CTs (p = 0.02), and lower serum levels of SH-groups (p = 0.03) and ceruloplasmin (p = 0.03) compared with Group 2. The concentration of most studied indicators of pro- and antioxidant status did not depend on the severity of the acute phase COVID-19, and only catalase activity was statistically significantly related to the need for hospitalization (r = 0.59;p = 0.001), oxygen support (r = 0.44;p = 0.02), and the percentage of lung injury according to computed tomography (p = 0.03). Although the serum concentration of transferrin did not differ between the studied groups, the individual analysis showed that its value was statistically higher in HD patients with severe COVID-19 even 3.5 months after infection (p < 0.0001). Conclusions. Long-term COVID-19 sequelae in HD patients are associated with oxidative stress. High levels of catalase activity and serum transferrin 3.5 months after COVID-19 may be a consequence of the severe course of the acute phase of the disease. The obtained data suggest that the use of antioxidants may be one of the possible strategies to treat the long-term consequences of COVID in HD patients. © N. Stepanova, L. Korol, L. Snisar, A. Rysyev, T. Ostapenko,V. Marchenko, O. Belousova, O. Popova, N. Malashevska, M. Kolesnyk, 2023. All rights reserved.

Outcomes among patients admitted with cardiogenic shock during the first year of the covid-19 pandemic in the united states

BackgroundOutcomes of patients hospitalized for cardiogenic shock during the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States have yet to be well described. This study aimed to examine if the COVID-19 pandemic led to gender differences in in-hospital outcomes, length of stay, and total hospital charges.MethodsData was extracted from the National Inpatient Sample database for the calendar year 2020. Patients who were admitted with a principal diagnosis of cardiogenic shock (R57.0) were identified using relevant International Classification of Disease, and Clinical Modification codes. The key outcomes of mortality, use of mechanical ventilation, use of mechanical circulatory support, hemodialysis, vasopressors use, length of stay, and total hospital charges were then accessed.ResultsThere were 2,670 hospitalizations for a principal diagnosis of cardiogenic shock in 2020, of which 955 were females. After adjusting for age, race, hospital bed size, hospital location, hospital teaching status, insurance status, income level, and Elixhauser comorbidities;we found that females admitted with cardiogenic shock were more likely to require mechanical ventilation (aOR 1.54, 95% CI 1.02- 2.34), but had no difference in mortality, vasopressor use, mechanical circulatory support use, hemodialysis initiation, length of hospital stay and total hospital charges relative males.ConclusionOur study found that females admitted for cardiogenic shock during the first year of the pandemic had significantly higher rates of mechanical ventilation but no difference in other outcomes. Further studies are needed to investigate the effect of COVID-19 on the outcomes of female patients admitted for cardiogenic shock.Conflict of InterestNone

Pancreatic Stone Protein (PSP) as a predictive biomarker of multiple organ failure and clinical outcome

Background: COVID-19 syndrome is associated with high morbidity and mortality in haemodialyzed patients. Pancreatic Stone Protein (PSP) is an early biomarker of sepsis and a prognostic biomarker of disease severity in critically-ill patients and can be rapidly measured at the patient's bedside with a point-of-care-test from a small drop of whole blood. The aim of our pilot was to investigate PSP in patients requiring haemodialysis with SARS-CoV-2 infection, at different severities of COVID-19 disease. Method(s): Between February and July 2021, 23 patients (6 severe COVID-19 with Acute Kidney Injury, 6 moderate COVID-19 haemodialyzed, 2 haemodialyzed without COVID-19 and 3 healthy controls) were recruited at the University Hospital of Foggia for PSP evaluation. Biomarker's measurements were performed within 48 hours after admission or upon arrival for haemodialysis (pre-treatment). PSP was measured at the patient's bedside with "abioSCOPE", a point-of-care test capable of evaluating PSP levels in five minutes from a small drop (50mul) of whole blood or serum. Result(s): The preliminary results of this pilot study showed a trend for PSP to increase along with the severity of disease. In fact, serum PSP levels were significantly higher in Intensive Care Unit subjects than in COVID-19 negative haemodialysis subjects and controls (ANOVA p=0.032). Furthermore, PSP levels were significantly higher in subjects who died (p<0.017). Whether this increase is due to the kidney injury or COVID-19 disease remains unknown, and more research is needed to understand the relationship. Conclusion(s): Several clinical studies published in literature have shown the predictive value of PSP in the early identification of sepsis and severity of the clinical outcome. In our experience we have seen a trend for PSP to increase with disease severity also in COVID-19 patients. These results are preliminary, but PSP was significantly higher in patients who died, in accordance with the literature. This experience also has demonstrated the feasibility of a point of care system to be easily implemented in the unit and adopted by personnel and its design enables fast results and immediate decisions to be taken, especially in urgent situations.

COVID-19 in patients with advanced stages of diabetic kidney disease: new onset renal replacement therapy as one of the predictors of adverse outcome

Background: patients with Diabetes Mellitus 2 (DM2) and advanced stages of Diabetic Kidney Disease (DKD) are at high risk for the lethal outcome of COVID-19. The causes of high mortality and the prognostic signifi cance of the new onset of renal replacement therapy (hemodialysis de novo, HD de novo) among these patients are still points of debate. Aim: the identifi cation of risk factors (RF) of lethal outcome in patients with DKD 4-5D stages and evaluation of the prognostic value of HD de novo in patients not receiving HD at the time of hospital admission. Methods: the patients with COVID-19 and advanced stages of DKD were included in a retrospective observational study from 04.01. to 10.30.2020. The endpoints were the outcome of hospitalization (discharge/death) and HD de novo initiation during the inpatient course. Several demographic, DM2, DKD, and COVID-19-associated signs and laboratory parameters were analyzed as independent variables. The subgroup of patients with HD de novo was selected from the general cohort. Results: 120 patients with DKD 4-5D stages were included, with a mean age of 69±10 y, females - 52%. Initially, the observation cohort was divided into subgroups: DKD 4-5 and DKD 5D on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). The mortality among patients with DKD 4-5 was comparable with the patients on MHD (38,2% vs 38,5%, р=0,975). The independent predictors of lethal outcome in group DKD 4-5 were: age ≥65 y (OR 12,30;95% CI 1,40-33,5;р=0,009), initial prandial glycemia ≥10 mmol/l (OR 14,5;95% CI 3,7-55,4;р<0,001), albuminemia at admission ≤35 g/l (OR 5,17;95% CI 1,52-17,50;р=0,012), Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) ≥10 (OR 6,69;95% CI 1,95-23,00;р=0,002), News2 >4 at admission (OR 7,58;95% CI 2,18-26,37;р=0,001), lung damage CT 3-4 at admission (OR 3,39;95% CI 1,09-10,58;р=0,031). In subgroup DKD 5D the independent predictors of lethal outcome were prandial glycemia at admission ≥10 mmol/l (OR 28,5;95% CI 7,1-33,5;р<0,001), lung damage at admission CT 3-4 (OR 8,35;95% CI 2,64-26,40;р<0,001), CCI ≥10 (OR 6,00;95% CI 1,62-22,16;р=0,006). To determine the risk of lethal outcome predictive models were created using identifi ed risk factors and variables. The predictive value for DKD 4-5 group was 93%, and for DKD 5D was 88%. The assessment of the overall predictive value of these models was carried out using ROC analysis. The mortality among patients with DKD 4-5 without HD de novo was 21,6% vs 72,2% in patients with initiated HD de novo (р<0,001). The independent predictors of HD de novo during the inpatient course were: prandial glycemia at admission ≥10 mmol/l (OR 3,38;95% CI 1,04-10,98;р=0,050), albuminemia at admission ≤35 г/л (OR 3,41;95% CI 1,00-11,55;р=0,050), News2 >4 at admission (OR 5,60;95% CI 1,67-19,47;р=0,006), eGFR ≤20 ml/min/1,73 m2 at admission (OR 4,24;95% CI 1,29-13,99;р=0,020). HD de novo was identifi ed as an independent predictor of adverse outcomes (OR 9,42;95% CI 2,58-34,4;р=0,001). The analysis of cumulative survival demonstrated comparable results in DKD 4-5 without HD de novo group and DKD 5D group. The cumulative 55-day survival in the subgroup with HD de novo was only 10%. Conclusion: the need to start HD de novo is one of the most powerful predictors of adverse outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with advanced DKD. The comparable mortality rate in DKD 4-5 and DKD 5D groups is due to extremely high mortality in the subgroup with HD de novo. The strict control and correction of HD de novo risk factors could turn them into modifi able ones and thus improve the survival prognosis of patients with advanced stages of DKD. © 2023 JSC Vidal Rus. All rights reserved.

Management and standardization of hemodialysis centers in lockdown areas under the epidemic of coronavirus disease 2019.

Maintenance hemodialysis patients need to return to hospital 3 times a week for routine hemodialysis treatment. In the case of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and regional lockdown, a set of management systems and standardizations has been established in our hemodialysis center, including forward movement of the critical nodes of treatment, specialists pooling program for hemodialysis technology, and dynamic bubble personnel management, to implement dynamic prevention and control strategies, precise management of inpatient wards and closed-loop management of outbreaks. While improving the management of our own hemodialysis center, it is recommended to strengthen multi-center collaboration to build a municipal grid management system for hemodialysis and explore different dialysis strategies for end-stage renal disease to meet the treatment needs and safety management of maintenance hemodialysis patients in lockdown areas under the epidemic.Copyright © 2022, Second Military Medical University Press. All rights reserved.

IDDF2023-ABS-0005 Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment experience using smart fusion in dialysis patients

BackgroundApproximately 700 dialysis patients are seen at our hospital. Among them are patients with HCC that develop viral hepatitis. Advances in ultrasound systems have improved the accuracy of HCC treatment and diagnosis. This time, we had the opportunity to use microwaves for dialysis patients using Smart Fusion and needle navigation installed in APLIOi800 so that we will report it.MethodsTen dialysis patients were treated from January 2018 to February 2023. An Emprint (Covidien, USA) antenna was used for treatment. Canon APLIOi800(Canon, Tochigi, Japan) was used. The built-in function is Smart Fusion. This method can display ultrasound imaging and volume data from other modalities, such as CT and MRI, in association with positional information using a magnetic sensor. Needle navigation has a function that can confirm the position of the needle. It is possible to treat even when the tumor is overprinted and the visualization is poor due to bubbles. Informed consent was obtained from all patients and the treatment was performed.ResultsIt was possible to visualize all tumors. In this study, CT images were used in 0 cases, and MRI was used in 1 Case. No serious side effects occurred after treatment.ConclusionsUsing this method, it was thought that dialysis patients could be safely and accurately treated.

Being A Hemodialysis Nurse During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Phenomenological Approach.

This study aimed to research the experiences of hemodialysis nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study was designed with a descriptive phenomenological approach. The study was conducted with a total of 18 hemodialysis nurses. Content analysis method was used in the analysis of the data. As a result of the content analysis, six themes were determined. These were (I) encountering COVID-19, (II) social isolation, (III) difficulty maintaining nursing care, (IV) organizational issues, (V) professionalism, and (VI) coping methods. The research revealed that hemodialysis nurses experienced difficulties in their family lives, social lives, working environment and patient treatment during the pandemic. It was concluded that hemodialysis nurses need support physically and psychologically to cope with the fear of death, anxiety, exhaustion, and fatigue that they have experienced while working selflessly and vigorously with a small number of teams.

Anxiety, depression, and related factors in hemodialysis patients during the lockdown period of COVID- 19 in China: a multicenter study.

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) made a huge impact on hemodialysis (HD) patients. The aim of the study was to survey the anxiety, depression and related factors of HD patients during the lockdown and to explore the factors that affect their anxiety and depression. From February 1 to 15, 2020, an online survey was conducted in HD patients; the survey collected information on demographic data, epidemic perception, travel status and Zung's Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Zung's Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS). The original SAS and SDS data from 96 HD patients gathered between May and August 2018 were retained as data for the control group. A total of 506 HD patients were recruited, and the prevalence of anxiety and depression was 22.33% and 45.45%, respectively. They had significantly higher SAS and SDS scores than the HD patients before the epidemic (p < 0.01; p < 0.05). It was found that self-threat perception, trouble related to transportation and skipping dialysis sessions were factors related to anxiety in HD patients during the lockdown (p ˂ 0.05). Education level, trouble related to transportation and the awareness of the seriousness of the epidemic were factors related to depression (p ˂ 0.05). During the COVID-19 lockdown period, HD patients reported higher levels of psychological distress than HD patients before the pandemic. Psychological support and transport policies should be provided to them.

Medium Cut-Off versus Low-Flux Dialyzers in Hemodialysis Patients with COVID-19: Clinical Outcomes and Reduction in Interleukin-6.

INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused extensive morbidity and mortality worldwide. Hemodialysis (HD) patients are both vulnerable to COVID-19 infection and tend to suffer greater disease severity and mortality. This retrospective study aimed to compare medium cut-off (MCO) and low-flux (LF) membrane dialyzers in terms of interleukin-6 (IL-6) reduction, change in inflammatory state, intradialytic complications, and mortality in chronic HD patients with COVID-19. METHOD: HD patients with a confirmed COVID-19 infection were admitted to the hospital for 10-14 days and underwent HD at the COVID-HD unit. Choice of dialyzer membrane used (MCO vs. LF) depended on the primary nephrologist(s). We collected data on demographics, baseline characteristics, laboratory results, diagnosis, treatments, HD prescription, hemodynamic status during HD, and mortality at 14 and 28 days after. RESULTS: IL-6 reduction ratio (RR) in the MCO group was 9.7 (interquartile range, 71.1) percent, which was significantly higher than that of the LF group (RR, -45.7 [interquartile range, 70.2] percent). The incidence rate of intradialytic hypotension in the MCO group was 3.846 events per 100 dialysis hours (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.954-6.856), which was significantly lower than that of the LF group (9.057; 95% CI, 5.592-13.170). Overall, mortality was not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The MCO membrane was more effective in removing IL-6 and was better tolerated than the LF membrane. Large, randomized controlled trials are required to confirm the relative benefits of the MCO membrane, especially mortality. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, our results suggest that the MCO membrane may be beneficial in chronic HD patients with COVID-19.

A Third Dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine Improves Immune Response in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients have an increased risk of morbidity and mortality following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Vaccination in these patients is prioritized, and monitoring of the immune response is paramount to define further vaccination strategies. This prospective study included a cohort of 100 adult CKD patients: 48 with kidney transplant (KT) and 52 on hemodialysis without prior COVID-19. The patients were assessed for humoral and cellular immune responses after four months of an anti-SARS-CoV-2 primary two-dose vaccination scheme (CoronaVac or BNT162b2) and one month after a booster third dose of BNT162b2 vaccine. We identified poor cellular and humoral immune responses in the CKD patients after a primary vaccination scheme, and these responses were improved by a booster. Robust polyfunctional CD4+ T cell responses were observed in the KT patients after a booster, and this could be attributed to a higher proportion of the patients having been vaccinated with homologous BNT162b2 schemes. However, even after the booster, the KT patients exhibited lower neutralizing antibodies, attributable to specific immunosuppressive treatments. Four patients suffered severe COVID-19 despite three-dose vaccination, and all had low polyfunctional T-cell responses, underscoring the importance of this functional subset in viral protection. In conclusion, a booster dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in CKD patients improves the impaired humoral and cellular immune responses observed after a primary vaccination scheme.

Health-related quality of life of dialysis patients during early COVID-19 lockdowns: a snapshot from a public hospital in Malaysia.

Background: End-stage renal disease is the last stage of chronic kidney disease and can affect the quality of life (QOL) of dialysis patients. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of life and examine its determinants. Methods: A cross-sectional survey involving patients on dialysis in a tertiary hospital was conducted from July 2020 to September 2020. Demographic data were collected using a predesigned questionnaire. QOL was measured using the 36-item KDQOL questionnaire, and statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS version 25. Results: Of the 108 patients, 59 were men and 49 were women, and the mean age was 48.15 ± 15.4 years. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the mean score of all components of health-related quality of life in different types of dialysis. The demographic data, which included age, gender, ethnicity, marital status, education level, occupation, and monthly income, did not significantly affect the QOL of dialysis patients. Patients with a dialysis duration of more than 5 years had a better QOL compared to other groups. Laboratory parameters such as low albumin and low hemoglobin showed a significant correlation with the health-related quality of life of dialysis patients. Conclusion: The quality of life among patients on dialysis was impaired, especially in terms of burden of the kidney disease. Hypoalbuminemia and anemia were the two factors that influenced QOL.

Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir for hemodialysis patients with COVID-19.

Background: Hemodialysis patients have a high risk of severe/critical COVID-19 and related high mortality, but nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is not recommended for hemodialysis patients with COVID-19 infection because of lack of evidence of safety. Objectives: Our study aims to evaluate the minimum plasma concentration (Cmin) of nirmatrelvir and its safety of different doses of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in hemodialysis patients with mild COVID-19. Method: This was a prospective, two step, nonrandomized, open-label study. Participants were treated with nirmatrelvir 150 mg or 300 mg once a day (another 75 mg or 150 mg supplied after hemodialysis) and ritonavir 100 mg twice daily for 5 days, respectively. The primary outcome was the safety of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, including the Cmin of nirmatrelvir and the number of adverse events (AE). The secondary outcome was the time of viral elimination in hemodialysis patients. Results: Adverse events were happened in 3 and 7 participants in the step 1 and step 2 group, respectively (p = 0.025). Among them, 2 and 6 participants were identified as drug-related adverse events (p = 0.054). No SAE or liver function damage happened. The Cmin of nirmatrelvir in step 1 and step 2 group were 5,294.65 ± 2,370.59 ng/mL and 7,675.67 ± 2,745.22 ng/mL (p = 0.125). The Cmin of the control group was 2,274.10 ± 1,347.25 ng/mL (p = 0.001 compared to step 2 and p = 0.059 compared to step 1). Compared to hemodialysis patients without nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, there were no statistical differences in overall viral elimination time (p = 0.232). Conclusion: In our study, two doses of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir appeared to be excessive for hemodialysis patients. Although all of the patients tolerated 5-day administration, nearly half of the patients experienced drug-related adverse events. In addition, the medication group did not show a significant advantage in the time of viral elimination.

Digital Healthy Diet Literacy and Fear of COVID-19 as Associated with Treatment Adherence and Its Subscales among Hemodialysis Patients: A Multi-Hospital Study.

Treatment adherence (TA) is a critical issue and is under-investigated in hemodialysis patients. A multi-center study was conducted from July 2020 to March 2021 on 972 hemodialysis patients in eight hospitals in Vietnam to explore the factors associated with TA during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data were collected, including socio-demographics, an End-Stage Renal Disease Adherence Questionnaire (ESRD-AQ), 12-item short-form health literacy questionnaire (HLS-SF12), 4-item digital healthy diet literacy scale (DDL), 10-item hemodialysis dietary knowledge scale (HDK), 7-item fear of COVID-19 scale (FCoV-19S), and suspected COVID-19 symptoms (S-COVID19-S). Bivariate and multivariate linear regression models were used to explore the associations. Higher DDL scores were associated with higher TA scores (regression coefficient, B, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 95%CI, 0.59, 2.12; p = 0.001). Higher FCoV-19S scores were associated with lower TA scores (B, -1.78; 95%CI, -3.33, -0.24; p = 0.023). In addition, patients aged 60-85 (B, 24.85; 95%CI, 6.61, 43.11; p = 0.008) with "very or fairly easy" medication payment ability (B, 27.92; 95%CI, 5.89, 44.95; p = 0.013) had higher TA scores. Patients who underwent hemodialysis for ≥5 years had a lower TA score than those who received <5 years of hemodialysis (B, -52.87; 95%CI, -70.46, -35.28; p < 0.001). These findings suggested that DDL and FCoV-19S, among other factors, should be considered in future interventions to improve TA in hemodialysis patients.

Comparison of Diet, Sleep, and Stress During the Emergency Coronavirus Disease Curfew in Men and Women with Hemodialysis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on diet, stress, and sleep in Japanese patients with hemodialysis. METHODS: Data on nutritional intake, frequency of food intake by cuisine, dietary behavior, and frequency of food use before and during the declaration of the state of emergency due to COVID-19, were collected. RESULTS: For the 81 participants (47 men), changes were observed in the following diet-related items: nutrition and nutrient content (one item for men, three for women), eating behavior, and frequency of food use (1 item for men, six for women), and the total number of items was two for men and nine for women. Nine out of 12 questions addressed stress and six out of eight questions addressed sleep, with a higher percentage of women adversely affected and no item with a higher percentage of men adversely affected. The mean score for stress was 25.3 ± 5.1 for men and 29.5 ± 5.0 for women, P < .001, and for sleep disturbance was 11.6 ± 3.0 for men and 14.4 ± 4.4 for women, P < .001. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with hemodialysis, the effect of refraining from going out due to the spread of COVID-19 on diet, sleep, and stress was suggested to be more significant in women than in men.

The correlation between caregiver burden with depression and quality of life among informal caregivers of hemodialysis and thalassemia patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Lifelong provision of care to chronically ill patients increase the risk of physical and mental diseases in informal caregivers and adversely affects their quality of life. The present study examined the correlation between caregiver burden, depression, and quality of life among the informal caregivers of thalassemia and hemodialysis patients during the COVID-19 pandemic in southeastern Iran. METHODS: This cross-sectional correlational study used convenience sampling to select 200 informal caregivers involved in providing direct care for patients undergoing hemodialysis (n = 70) and patients with thalassemia (130) for at least 6 months. A demographic questionnaire, Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI), the Quality-Of-Life Questionnaire (SF-36), and the Zarit Burden Interview were used to collect data in 2021. The data were analyzed with SPSS software (version 19) using frequency, percentage, independent samples t-test, ANOVA, and multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: Most of the informal caregivers of the thalassemia and hemodialysis patients (58% and 43%) reported moderate levels of caregiver burden. There were significant correlations between the caregiver burden and depression (P < 0.0001) and between the caregiver burden and the quality of life (P < 0.009). The level of depression in informal caregivers of patients undergoing hemodialysis was higher than that of the informal caregivers of patients with thalassemia, but the quality of life in the informal caregivers of the patient's undergoing hemodialysis was higher than that of the informal caregivers of the patients with thalassemia. CONCLUSION: Considering the significant correlations between caregiver burden, depression, and quality of life in this study, healthcare providers are recommended to develop educational and supportive interventions to meet informal caregivers' needs, mitigate their emotional distress, fears, and concerns, and prevent caregiver burden in times of greater uncertainty.